- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:47:02 -0400
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Hi Karl I think I got sloppy in the numbering..... 1. Specifying Conformance 1.1 A conformance clause is essential Principle 1.1a: Include a conformance clause Good Practice 1.1a: Define the specification's conformance... Good Practice 1.1b: Specificy the conformance clause 1.2 Specify how to make conformance claims Good Practice 1.2a: Provide the wording for conformance claims Good Practice 1.2b; Provide an ICS The numbers can be before or after the Principle/GP: for example as shown above or 1.2a Good Practice 1.2b Good Practice or we could have 1.2 Good Practice A 1.2 Good Practice B Which ever you think is clearest. We could also keep the numbering in order, regardless of it being a P/GP, for example 1.1 Principle A 1.1 Good Practice B 1.1 Good Practice C 1.1 Principle D I think I prefer this. --lynne >Le 06 oct. 2004, à 19:25, Lynne Rosenthal a écrit : >> Suggest changing the numbering system to numbers rather than >> letters so A becomes 1 Specifying Conformance. A.1 becomes 1.1. The >> first Principle becomes >> A1.1 Principle A >> A1.1 Principle B >> Etc. > >You have proposed this scheme? > >****************** >1 Specifying Conformance >1.1 A conformance clause is essential > >Principle A: .... >Good Practice A: ... >Good Practice B: ... > >1.2 Specify how to make conformance claims >******************** >etc. > >So if I give a reference to >1.1 P-A I can address a specific part. ? >1.1 GP-A > >I modified only the 1.1 section (new scheme) to see if it's ok for you. > >-- >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >W3C Conformance Manager >*** Be Strict To Be Cool *** >
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 12:47:02 UTC