W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2004

[ISSUE] Use of RFC 2119 keywords only for the Conformance Clause

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:31:14 -0400
Message-Id: <72770270-1D4E-11D9-8C47-000A95718F82@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
As Lynne has noticed it, we don't use RFC 2119 keywords in our 
conformance clause, but in the Conformance clause.

Le 04 oct. 2004, à 19:45, Lynne Rosenthal a écrit :
> 4. The keywords, MUST, MUST NOT, etc.  We don’t actually use these in 
> our document.  Do we still need to include this statement?
> The last sentence, “Occurrences of these words in lowercase… with no 
> normative implications” is NOT true.  Our Conformance Clause uses 
> ‘must’ and has a normative implication.

Would it be acceptable to include those in the Conformance section?

Proposed Text:
The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
as defined in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] in this conformance clause. 
Occurrences of these words in lowercase has normative implications.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 23:38:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:33 UTC