Re: CR issues disposition from Bjoern Hoehrmann on 2004-06-28 (www-qa-wg@w3.org from June 2004)

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:07:03 +0200
To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <40e087d5.668860961@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>Our understanding is that you want the SpecGL to insist on the need to
>define labels going along with conformance, i.e. that a specification
>should create a well-defined label to designate an implementation
>conforming to it in one of the specified ways.

>We plan to improve this section to address the specific concern you
>raised, but want to make sure first that we understood your issue
>correctly this time :)

I think so, yes. Thanks.

Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 17:07:47 UTC