- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:55:10 +0900
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <F00B924F-60E3-11D8-B2DD-000393A63FC8@w3.org>
Hello QAWG, As you know, the WCAG working group is taking QA seriously and have been trying to follow our guidelines as closely as possible. I usually try to answer question from Jenae Andershonis (QA contact within WCAG WG), but she recently sent me a batch for which I could use your insight, and I thought you'd be interested in the feedback they provide, too... Specl GL: > I have a question about Checkpoint 7.1. Use conformance key words. The > latest structure for WCAG 2.0 is Principle | Guideline | Level (1, 2 > or 3) Success Criteria. > My question is at what level should the RFC 2119 keywords be applied? > Should the keywords be used in the statement for Principle, Guideline > or Success Criteria? Or at all three? My guess is that it should be at > the Success Criteria level. So do I. What do you think? Test GL (based on TR version) > Question #1 > Checkpoint 4.3. Automation of testing is encouraged. > > We weren’t sure if this meant that the test cases should be > automatable, (i.e. doesn’t involve a human opinion). Or if it means > that we should engage with vendors of tools like A-Prompt and Bobby, > or does it mean something even different than these two > interpretations. Not sure what Jenae means by "engaging" here, but my interpretation of the GL is that the tests should be automatable when possible. (which, for WCAG, is not always/necessarily/easily possible) > Question #2 > Checkpoint 6.1. Organize conformance testing activities. > Would the definition of vendor be like Watchfire (Bobby tool)? I think this is an interesting one... AFAIK vendors here mean implementors of the specification, which does not necessarily mean anything for Guideline specifications... A wording warning for the QAF, I suppose. No "vendor" entry in the QA glossary it seems: http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/keyword/qa-glossary.rdf/?keywords=vendor > Question #3 > Checkpoint 6.2. Encourage Vendors to publish test results. > Is the preferred “Special place” within the W3C site or a link to the > vendor’s site? > And should we create something like the 508 VPAT for the vendor to > complete? IIRC, for test result publication, W3C is preferred, though not strongly. Correct? > Question #4 > > Our proposed charter [2] states that we would commit to attaining QA > level three. Now that the conformance structure has been changed to A, > AA and AAA, what would level three equate to? And do we need to list > out of conformance goals for all three of the QA specs. > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/08/wcag-charter.html I think this has been simplified and corrected in Ops, correct? http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-qaframe-ops-20030922/guidelines- chapter#Gd-address-QA-in-charter I do not, however, recall what level three would be equivalent to (A or AA I guess), could anyone tell me? Hope this list of question provides you with interesting feedback, and that you can help me give good answers to this very motivated group. -- olivier
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 19:55:15 UTC