- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:27:18 -0600
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 04:58 PM 4/26/2004 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >A few comments as I read this: >- it is starting to look really good! It's so much nicer to read than >the old opsGl! Thanks! >- "staff" is used in 2 different contexts: staff contact and more >generally "staff resources" (or staffing) ; the former is part of the >W3C culture and should be kept, but the latter brings confusion - I read >resources from the W3C Team when I read "staff resources" ; I don't know >what's the good term to use, here, but I think we need to find one :) We should stack this one. I don't have the time right now for looking and thinking about each occurrence. (A contribution would be welcome.) >- re number of participants in a WG from a given company, the max number >can be set in the charter per >http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#member-rep Thanks, I integrated that. Today's editing is reflected in: >[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/QA-handbook.html Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 19:27:44 UTC