- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:58:43 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 10:59:17 UTC
Le dim 25/04/2004 à 21:30, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > New version at: > > [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/QA-handbook.html A few comments as I read this: - it is starting to look really good! It's so much nicer to read than the old opsGl! - regarding the 1st issue (stories grouped or distributed), I keep prefering the stories in context ; I think they make more sense ther. I guess putting them at the start of the sections is good, but I don't have a strong opinion - "staff" is used in 2 different contexts: staff contact and more generally "staff resources" (or staffing) ; the former is part of the W3C culture and should be kept, but the latter brings confusion - I read resources from the W3C Team when I read "staff resources" ; I don't know what's the good term to use, here, but I think we need to find one :) - re number of participants in a WG from a given company, the max number can be set in the charter per http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#member-rep (more later) Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 10:59:17 UTC