Re: Proposed charter to move the Patent Policy

Looks good.  Under Milestones, you should replace
Spring 2004: face-to-face at WWW2004 in New York, NY, USA.  with the F2F in 
Santa Clara, CA.

--Lynne

At 11:56 AM 4/8/2004, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>Hello QA WG,
>
>As we discussed and informally agreed during our F2F meeting in Cannes,
>I've started the administrative work needed to move our WG to the W3C
>Patent Policy ; as described in [1], the first step is to develop a
>charter including the wording for the Patent Policy, which I have
>prepared at:
>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/charter-pp
>
>This charter differs from the current one [2] on the following points:
>- the Confidentiality and IPR section has been split in 2 sections which
>are now "Confidentiality" and "Patent disclosures" referring to the
>appropriate wording
>- the quality commitment in the "Scope and deliverables" has been
>amended so that it does not refer to a specific level of conformance to
>our guidelines ; the text now reads as
>    "In its operations, specifications, and test materials the QAWG will
>     comply with its own guidelines."
>  (this is incorporated as an editorial modification, which means that
>whatever conformance model we choose for our own guidelines, we're still
>committed to target the highest level of conformance)
>- the W3C Staff resource commitment has been updated to reflect the
>changes of Activity lead
>
>Unless I hear comments against proceeding, this draft charter will be
>proposed to the AC Reps of QA WG participants on Monday, for a
>consensus-based vote as described in [1].
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dom
>
>1. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/05-pp-transition#impact
>2. http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter
>--
>Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/ERCIM
>mailto:dom@w3.org
>

Received on Thursday, 8 April 2004 13:01:04 UTC