- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:17:26 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Hi, A comment has been made by the OWL WG, which raises a fair enough point. If they try to implement the QA Ops GL, they may have to modify their charter to comply with the checkpoints: CP 1.1 Where it's explained in the Examples and Techniques. Amend a charter for an existing WG. CP 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 too. - What's happening if they modify their charter to try the QA Framework Ops GL and notice later on, that the CP has disappeared. - What's happening if they notice that they will engage themselves in a process they don't want now. - Is there room for a thought experience during our CR phase. So WG trying to do like if they were making it real, but not really. For example write a mockup charter, like if they had to comply and report what are the problems. Suggestions? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 09:17:28 UTC