- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:26:00 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QA Working Group Teleconference Monday, 30-june-2003 -- Scribe: Lofton Henderson Attendees: (LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO - WG co-chair) (SM) Sandra Martinez (NIST) (DM) David Marston (IBM/Lotus -- guest [QAIG]) Regrets: (PC) Patrick Curran (Sun Microsystems) (PF) Peter Fawcett (RealNetworks) (KG) Kirill Gavrylyuk (Microsoft) (DH) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (W3C) (LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO - WG co-chair) (LR) Lynne Rosenthal (NIST - IG co-chair) (MS) Mark Skall (NIST) Absent: (dd) Dimitris Dimitriadis (Ontologicon) (KD) Karl Dubost (W3C, WG co-chair) (AT) Andrew Thackrah (Open Group) *** Non-meeting -- no quorum *** *** These notes are the final "minutes" *** Summary of New Action Items: none. Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jun/0090.html Previous Telcon Minutes: [DRAFT] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jun/0077.html Minutes: There not being a quorum -- no meeting. David, Sandra, and Lofton discussed David's draft SpecGL review [1] of Last Call F&O for Xquery and Xpath for a while. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jun/0090.html Unclear what exactly to do with it, as there was not a QAWG quorum to endorse it as official QAWG position. Therefore we decided: 1.) David to send it to F&O editors, indicating its uncertain status. Also noting in introduction that it was reviewed against LCWD of SpecGL. SpecGL LC issues processing is done (almost), resulting in numerous changes and improvements to the document, but substantially the same normative content (requirements). Also asking if they want it sent to public comments list for LC. (--DONE--). 2.) Lofton to ask QA chairs/staff about: QAWG versus DM personal contribution; given lack of Process requirements, and given SpecGL's own incomplete state, should publicly present review to Xquery WG as LC comments to be responded to? Or, should we present them informally to the WG as helpful comments? (Or, should we ask the WG their preference?). (--DONE--). ### end ###
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 18:25:55 UTC