Monday (09 June) QAWG telecon agenda

QAWG participants --

If you won't attend the Monday (9-jun) QAWG telcon, please reply (to list) 
with "regrets".

This is a regular teleconference, whose principal topic will 
be:  processing  SpecGL Last Call issues.  The below list includes all 
SpecGL LC issues that are still Active.  I don't expect that we will get 
much further than item #3, the TA-requirements group.

*** There is a *lot* of history and discussion now linked from the TA-reqts 
group -- please review it in advance ***

Agenda
=====

Scribe:  Andrew Thackrah

1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership

2.) any Last Call reviews

3.) SpecGL [1], LC-issues [3], groupings [4]
         - TAs, Requirements, etc:  13, 14, 29.4, 65, 67, 73.9, 75.9 [2]
         - Ref. TA-reqts new discussion thread [2a]
         - Ref. old QAWG issues #98, #99, #113.AR-1 [2b]
         - Ref. requirement vs. test assertion, see "AT" in [2c]
         - Ref. MS example of conf. reqt. vs. TA [2d]
         - Ref. must all conf reqt be testable? [2e]


4.) with any remaining time, we could start through these "ungrouped" ones:

LC-17 (can deprecated features be "distributed" throughout spec?)
LC-20 [editorial] (single section okay for "universal rqts"?)
LC-19 (clarify "[profiles] experience has shown)
LC-22 [editorial] [should be in cat/class group?]
LC-25 [editorial] (scope/goals suggestion)
parts of LC-29
LC-34 [editorial] [should be in TA/conf-rqts group?]
LC-64 [editorial] (conf. terms must be defined?)
parts of LC-73
parts of LC-75
parts of LC-77 (non-specGL, non-OpsGL:  FR-1 thru .FR-3; .GC-1 thru .GC-6)
parts of LC-77 (specET:   .ET-1 thru .ET-4)
LC-78 (provide conf-disclaimer template)
LC-88 [editorial] (reformat bullet list)

5.) Remaining SpecGL issue groups
         - SpecGL self-conformance (per MS review).
         - Major-restructure:  54, 74, 75, 102, 104, 105
         - DoV-related leftovers:  95

6.) Adjourn

7.) Overflow (12-12:30): available.

Logistics
=====
Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
11:00am-12noon EST.
code: 7294 ("QAWG")
IRC: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon

Regards,
-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-qaframe-spec-20030210/
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Jun/0013.html
[2a] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Jun/0007.html
[2b] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x98
[2c] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Dec/0110.html
[2d] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Dec/0104.html
[2e] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003May/0007.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/lc-issues
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jun/0008.html