- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 17:43:28 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- Status of SpecGL issues groups and ungrouped, as of today (03 June): GROUPS TO DO ----- TAs, Requirements, etc: 13, 14, 29.4, 65, 67, 73.9, 75.9 [, 106?] Related to major-restructure: 54, 74, 75, 102, 104, 105 IN PROGRESS ----- DoV-related leftovers: 95 UNGROUPED TO DO ----- SpecGL self-conformance (per MS review). LC-17 (can deprecated features be "distributed" throughout spec?) LC-20 [editorial] (single section okay for "universal rqts"?) LC-19 (clarify "[profiles] experience has shown) LC-22 [editorial] [should be in cat/class group?] LC-25 [editorial] (scope/goals suggestion) parts of 29 LC-34 [editorial] [should be in TA/conf-rqts group?] LC-64 [editorial] (conf. terms must be defined?) parts of 73 parts of 75 parts of 77 (non-specGL, non-OpsGL: FR-1 thru .FR-3; .GC-1 thru .GC-6) parts of 77 (specET: .ET-1 thru .ET-4) LC-78 (provide conf-disclaimer template) LC-88 [editorial] (reformat bullet list) DONE ----- Applicability/Normative exclusion: 26, 28, 73.2, 80 GL3-policy: 42, 96 Extensibility: 15, 29.5, 35, 37, 38, 52, 73.5, 73.6, 75.4, 81, 100, 101, 97 Profile/Module/Level: 30, 41, 49, 50, 51, 97, 98 Related to CP8.4: 16, 27, 39 Related to DoV explanation, relationships etc: 21, 66, 75.3, 75.5, 84, 90, 95, 77.SG-1 Related to Category/Class: 8, 11, 46, 48, 61, 73.3, 93, 94 Examples, use cases, etc: 23, 75.1, 77.ET-2, 79. 92 Deprecation: 33, 40, 99 GL/CP/Section numbering: 63, 91 What's normative in SpecGL: 36, 65, 106, 108 Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:43:19 UTC