- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:18:38 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Yes - it is because you keep telling me that I have to post these to the group. And, I did forget to give a date. Since most of these were editorial (and were trivial) - and were left to the editors and the more complicated ones were already vetted, I say 2 weeks at most - so close by Aug 11. to At 11:45 AM 7/31/2003, Lofton Henderson wrote: >At 11:30 AM 7/29/03 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >>QA WG >> >>A current working version of SpecGL is available at: >>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/07/qaframe-spec.html >>We are still working on the document, but as you can see much has been >>done and is still being done. [...] >> >>Below are many of the LC issue resolutions and the text that has been >>incorporated. Any comments? > >I'm assuming that this is being done as the final "Resolved-to-Closed" >step of these SpecGL issues? I.e., QAWG has a period to review the >proposed closures (draft SpecGL text), after which they are marked >"Closed" (per draft text) if there are no comments. > >When is the deadline for comments? > >Given that there were approximately 40 issues listed in the message, I >suggest *at least* two weeks -- that's a lot of issues and text to look at >and think about. (Three might be better.) > >Anyway, can you (SpecGL editors) suggest a deadline for comments, please? > >-Lofton. >
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:18:58 UTC