- From: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:59:52 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
>> >>The new Concept chapter will have a DoV caution and we agreed(?) that >>each DoV would have a simple caution statement. > >I have made an alternate proposal, which has been linked from the issue >list for some time: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Apr/0026.html > >I disagree that we should "tone it down" -- extensibility is #1 on my >interoperability list of evils. Extensibility does not equal DOV. DOV has to do with variability. Every technique for variability does not "extend" the standard. Subsetting, for example, does not extend. rather it organizes things differently **************************************************************** Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970 Voice: 301-975-3262 Fax: 301-590-9174 Email: skall@nist.gov ****************************************************************
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 11:00:06 UTC