Fwd: Comments on CC/PP Working Draft

Lynne's review is linked from the reviews matrix,

http://jigedit.w3.org/lhender/WWW/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews.html

(It was saved as crude HTML from my mail client, Eudora, and touched up a 
little.)

-Lofton.

>Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:51:05 -0400 (EDT)
>X-Sender: lsr@mailserver.nist.gov
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
>Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:50:34 -0400
>To: www-mobile@w3.org
>From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
>Cc: qa-chairs@w3.org
>Subject: Comments on CC/PP Working Draft
>X-Archived-At: 
>http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20030416143120.01c35c50@mailserver.nist.gov
>Resent-From: qa-chairs@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <qa-chairs@w3.org> archive/latest/1272
>X-Loop: qa-chairs@w3.org
>Sender: qa-chairs-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: qa-chairs-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <qa-chairs.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:qa-chairs-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>
>
>As a member of the QA Working Group, I reviewed the 
><http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab-20030325/>CC/PP Working 
>Draft with respect to its ability to satisfy the QA Framework: 
><http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-qaframe-spec-20030210/>Specification 
>Guideline (SpecGL).   [...snip...]