- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:34:43 -0600
- To: andrew@opengroup.org
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Andrew, At 06:28 PM 4/14/03 +0100, you wrote: > So how about Friday 2 May? > This suits me - does that give enough time to respond? Friday 2 May would be fine. We will put it on the agenda for Monday 5 May, with the purpose to see if anyone has any problems with sending it as a QAWG contribution. Please email it to qa-chairs@w3.org on Friday, not to QAWG. Someone will put it in ../QA/Group/.. (member-only) and send the URL to QAWG. Reason. We have been operating under the rules that these reviews are member-only. We have not yet addressed changing those rules. [On the one hand, we seem to be moving into operational mode for pro-active reviews of Last Call documents. On the other hand, SpecGL is still an in-development Working Draft, which was one of our motives for member-only]. -Lofton. >On 2003.04.14 18:19 Lofton Henderson wrote: >>Here is the Last Call message (member only): >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003AprJun/0013.html >>Closing date is 9 May. >>So what should be the AI date? Should we make these things due on the >>date of the QAWG telecon preceding the LC-close date? Or maybe the day >>before that telecon? That would give opportunity for Q&A about the >>target, or the review, or whatever. >>-Lofton. >
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 12:09:29 UTC