- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:44:48 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Starting at 10:00 is fine with me. At 12:09 PM 10/17/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote: >At 09:05 AM 10/17/02 -0400, you wrote: >>[...] >>2. Starting on time - that is no later than 10:05 > >That's sort of on time -- it only wastes about 10% of the hour. > >>(in case people's clocks are not exact). > >Really, can't we expect people to be able to know the correct time by now, >if they have an appointment on the hour? If we build 5 minutes grace, >then people will shoot for 11:05 and actually arrive at >11:09. Etc...etc...etc... > >The meeting and roll call should start as soon as the minuter is present, >and that should be 11:00 (okay, maybe 11:01). > >-Lofton. > >p.s. Do you want to circulate the phone number of the NIST atomic clock? > >p.p.s. Go to http://www.worldtimeserver.com/atomic-clock/. You can get a >free client -- "Atomic Clock Sync 2.6" -- to install on your computer. It >can automatically sync your computer clock with a server connected to the >atomic clock.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 12:51:14 UTC