- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:16:49 -0600
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 03:44 PM 10/17/02 +0900, Karl Dubost wrote: >Lofton, > >At 10:07 -0600 2002-10-14, Lofton Henderson wrote: >>1.) It should not be closed until we discuss issue #19 and consider the >>request to reverse that issue's resolution. >> >>2.) I *do not* want it removed or matched to the one in QA Glossary. >>(Note that it points to the one in the QA Glossary, and supplements or >>builds on it -- or at least that was the intention, in line with the >>constraints in the pre-Tokyo issue #19 disposition.) > >You have just forgotten there's a pending action item and that's my fault >about the glossary that should solve your concerns. Well, not really. See explanation in earlier message about issue #19. >1. The QA Glossary will be a dated version file. >So the specification can refer to a stable and specific version of the >glossary. The key issue is not that -- stable dated version. It is the remaining open bit of issue #19. -Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 12:16:55 UTC