- From: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:14:36 -0500
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
LH>Do you have any comments, issues, or feedback about SpecGL 20021108, >as a consequence of your review? By far the most obvious thing was that issues of navigation and discovery were under-represented in the checkpoints. The discretionary items are only detectable by a thorough reading of the entire document, and the "Conformance" chapter says nothing about them. LH>One thing caught my attention: >"Checkpoint 13.2. Distinguish normative and informative text.... DM>Informative material is distinguished. Most examples are not marked DM>and can be presumed from the context to be normative." LH>Is that a typo, "normative"? Surprisingly, no. If you look at the examples in context, the typical presentation is: given this, it must do that. In other words, they are more like test assertions. .................David Marston
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 10:15:41 UTC