Re: Review of XSLT 1.0 against SpecGL

• From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
• Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:40:25 -0700
• To: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
• Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021118173432.03900050@rockynet.com>

David,

Thanks for this, it looks good...

At 07:04 PM 11/17/02 -0500, you wrote:

>Attached is my review of XSLT 1.0. Let me know if I followed the format
>correctly.
>.................David Marston
>
>(See attached file: qaframe-spec-XSLT-review.html)

(Now at:  http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/11/qaframe-spec-XSLT-review).

1.)  I like your "Back matter" summary.  It would be nice for all to do 
such tallies as a matter of routine.

2.)  Do you have any comments, issues, or feedback about SpecGL 20021108, 
as a consequence of your review?

3.) One thing caught my attention:  "Checkpoint 13.2. Distinguish normative 
and informative text. [Priority 2]

Informative material is distinguished. Most examples are not marked and can 
be presumed from the context to be normative."

Is that a typo, "normative"?

Regards,
-Lofton.

Received on Monday, 18 November 2002 19:39:43 UTC