- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 17:24:08 -0700
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 11:17 AM 3/22/02 -0500, you wrote: >Karl >Thanks for taking the minutes. Corrections are below >[...] >>KG: agree >>LR: does it apply to validator? >>MS: we made the distinction for validators. For now, compliance >>validation is syntax validation is not only correct. >>LR: You should add a disclaimer TS or validator. >>KG: you can't be sure of the validator and TS >>MS: agree >>LR: definition of TMaterials is defined in my document. >>We provide a disclaimer for TS or Test Materials. > >LR definition of TMaterials is defined in the Introduction of this document. ==> QA Glossary [1] (Add validator, test materials to QA Glossary). Btw, [1] is not yet linked from anywhere on our QA pages, as far as I could find with a quick look at "Resources" and other places. [...] >>Checkpoint 7.4. If transfer of the test materials to W3C is planned, >>update the QA commitments in the Working Group charter if necessary. >>[Priority 2] >>LR: Process difficult >>KD: explain the process + pb with the end of life to the WG >>LR/KG: Discussion on rechartering. >>LR: it should be already there. >>KG: >> remove the CP or P3. >>LR: Removing it. Consensus >>KG: what we should do with that >>LR: capture it a paragraph. > >LR if possible, capture it in a paragraph and put as part of the Guideline >7 explanation I think that the W3C Process Document provides for modification of the charter when the WG's deliverables change. See [2]. There is apparently a lot of latitude in what is "substantial" enough to warrant revisions. I thought that the checkpoint was useful, but I don't feel strongly about it. The new explanation ought to refer to the Process requirements. The word "re-charter" is probably best avoided, as it is hard to decide what it means in terms of activities that [1] defines. I.e., the Process Document does not define the concept. -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/glossary [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/groups.html#WGCreation
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2002 19:21:49 UTC