- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:24:10 +0900
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Karl, thanks for these minutes. A few comments/corrections inline On Thu, Mar 21, 2002, Karl Dubost wrote: > KD: About a week in QA > http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/02/aweekinqa/ > It seems very difficult to motivate people to participate to > this review. Yes, that's too bad, I hope we can get the interest to raise once the "project" starts. > * Being a moderator/writer: When Karl Dubost be a reviewer, Olivier Théreaux Proposed rewording (your sentence seems a bit strange to me): "In order to ensure impartiality, OT will take over as a moderator when KD is the writer". > Checkpoint 5.3. > KG: two kind of license vendro submitted test materials, publisher vendor > Checkpoint 5.4. > MS/LR: Priority 2 because you have to explain why you don't remember the end of this sentence, either. Lynne? > Checkpoint 6.2. > LR: We are all agree. s/are// > Checkpoint 6.3. > In the QA Process document, describe how the test materials will be > published and point to the corresponding web page. [Priority 2] > Kyrill: remove the checkpoint. > Discussion > LR: It's strongly recommended to not publish in TR space. Did we decide, in the end, to remove the checkpoint? Thanks, -- Olivier
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 22:25:16 UTC