Re: Assignments matrix for the QA Framework review (was: XMLP Last Call Heads-Up)

Thanks Dom.

Here are some initial assignment entries:

** Lofton:  SVG Ops
** Dimitris:  DOM Ops
** Sandra (&Lynne):  XML Ops

Questions/suggestions:

1.) Could we accommodate both the assignment and the completed result in 
the same matrix?  I'm thinking that people would chose an assignment, at 
which time they would get an entry in the matrix (plus a completion 
date?).  There could be a link to the WG's home page, or document to be 
reviewed, or ...

When completed, we could add a link to the raw review data, which would be 
put in /QA/Group space.  (I'm not suggesting that we close our  procedures 
in general, but these "raw" review data really aren't suitable for general 
public consumption, I don't think.)

After we firm these details, I'll send links for the first three entries.

2.) Should we also link the current skeleton review forms from that 
page?  Attached is the primitive one that we used for the first three Ops 
GL reviews.  We could probably make a nicer one with a small variant of 
checklist.xslt (with numbering, document title, document "this version" 
link, and dated subtitle).

What do you think?

-Lofton.

At 11:20 AM 6/20/02 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:

>Le mer 19/06/2002 à 22:33, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> > Dom has an AI to make the assignments matrix, and we said that we'd 
> keep it
> > on the /QA/Group/ page.
>
>The matrix is available at
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews (member only)
>
>The good way to have your row updated is to send an email to WG with the
>WG/spec you've chosen (relevant links welcomed)
>
>It closes my AI, but I don't have a reference for it yet since the
>minutes aren't published yet.
>
>Dom
>--
>Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/INRIA
>mailto:dom@w3.org