- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:53:21 -0500
- To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>, <danield@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>, <ij@w3.org>
That would be fine - to move the information to the web site as a resource guide. -----Original Message----- From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 05:41 PM To: danield@w3.org Cc: lynne rosenthal; www-qa-wg@w3.org; ij@w3.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Issue #22 At 12:30 PM 1/7/02 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > > But what it seems to reduce to is: Should the Introduction be an > > introduction to the Framework documents alone? Or, to the QA Activity as > >My vote goes to an Intro for the Framework only, with a bit of QA >context but not the whole explanation like now. So I agree with Ian >and Lynne that most of section 2 should (and is already in fact) go on >the site. All comments support removing Ch.2, and having Intro be an introduction to the Framework documents only. Does everyone also support Ian's specific suggestion ([1]) to put it on the Web site as a resource introduction or resource guide? -Lofton. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Jan/0001.html
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 18:54:48 UTC