- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 15:40:59 -0700
- To: danield@w3.org
- Cc: "lynne rosenthal" <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, ij@w3.org
At 12:30 PM 1/7/02 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > > But what it seems to reduce to is: Should the Introduction be an > > introduction to the Framework documents alone? Or, to the QA Activity as > >My vote goes to an Intro for the Framework only, with a bit of QA >context but not the whole explanation like now. So I agree with Ian >and Lynne that most of section 2 should (and is already in fact) go on >the site. All comments support removing Ch.2, and having Intro be an introduction to the Framework documents only. Does everyone also support Ian's specific suggestion ([1]) to put it on the Web site as a resource introduction or resource guide? -Lofton. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Jan/0001.html
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 17:41:05 UTC