- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:10:48 -0700
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
(With this message, I close this AI...) A-2002-10-21-3 Lofton to get concrete proposal for issue 59 for next telecon. ===== Issue 59: Should there be a global (W3C-standard) license for submitted test materials? (Originator: Andrew). [1] I don't have a proposal for such a license. I suspect that W3C Legal would not be enthusiastic to try to define such a license, that would be acceptable to all companies that might submit TM and to all WGs. I suggest that we close the issue with the answer "No". We do have criteria under which TM are distributed by W3C (freely available, ...). And we do have proposals for licenses (and an OpsGL checkpoint) for publication of TM by W3C. (The proposal for the new TM license is currently stalled). See [2], [3]. So I propose that our resolution of this issue is that it be left up to the WGs or whoever receives the test materials. They should not (MUST NOT) accept TM under terms which prohibit W3C publication under suitable licenses and terms. This resolution would NOT, in itself, affect OpsGL CP5.3, "Define the licenses applicable to submitted test materials. [Priority 1]" [4]. The resolution only says that we shouldn't attempt to define a W3C-wide global license. CP5.3 still would require each WG to specify at least one license acceptable to it. Does anyone want to revisit *that* requirement? -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x59 [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x49 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Nov/0044.html [4] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/11/qaframe-ops-20021111#Ck-proc-define-licenses
Received on Sunday, 15 December 2002 14:09:25 UTC