More OpsGL leftovers from 11/25

Here is another OpsGL left-over from 25-nov -- an issue with CP4.6 [1] and 
a proposed solution.

Please read.  If you don't like the proposal, then reply and we will 
discuss it on telecon agenda.  Note that the proposal calls for reversal of 
the current text of the fulfillment criteria (as well as slight rewording 
of the CP itself).

 From the 25-nov OpsGL issues message [2]:
CP4.6: Does WG need to specify policy, whether or not branding is supported 
[current text]? Or only define the branding policy, if branding is 
supported? [Proposal. The latter. I.e., the WG does not need to mention 
branding at all if it is not supported in the WG's quality practices and/or 
test materials -- change the fulfillment criterion accordingly.]

-Lofton.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/11/qaframe-ops-20021111#Ck-specify-branding-policy
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Nov/0082.html