RE: Organisational Reminder

At 01:24 PM 8/7/02 -0700, you wrote:

>Why not keep www-qa-wg on the to line as well as www-qa?

This has the side effect that all QAWG members get two copies.  I guess 
that's better than the broken threads.

-Lofton.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 1:06 PM
>To: Karl Dubost; www-qa-wg@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Organisational Reminder
>
>
>There is a problem about switching a thread from one list to another,
>that
>I dislike a lot.  If something starts on www-qa-wg, and it is switched
>to
>www-qa, then the thread is broken on the original archive.  It simply
>stops, as if the thread died.
>
>Even if you know that it continues on the other archive, you can't use
>the
>"next in thread" button.  It is pretty inconvenient.
>
>Comments or suggestions?
>
>-Lofton.
>
>At 09:18 AM 8/7/2002 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to remind few principles.
> >
> >- Every issues raised on www-qa-wg MUST be discussed on www-qa
> >- Do not hit Reply and Send.
> >- How to do:
> >         1. Reply on www-qa@w3.org
> >         2. Gives the references to the message
> >         by using msg-id (not recommended, only if you are offline and
> > can't do another way.)
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2002/02/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20020805150918.03f30c60@rockyn
>et.com
> >         or web archive reference (preferred)
> >
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Aug/0027.html
> >         3. start your discussion.
> >- If the topic is slighty different from the subject, modify it.
> >
> >Thank you.
> >
> >--
> >Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
> >           http://www.w3.org/QA/
> >
> >      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
> >

Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2002 17:22:46 UTC