- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:59:28 +0300
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@terminal.rockynet.com>
- Cc: "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@microsoft.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
My two cents: I believe the original intent of the www-qa-wg/www-qa setup was to mimic most WG IG/WG division; keeping some things WG only, and communicating resolutions, calls for feedback and the like to the IG (www-qa) list. On the other hand, WG lists are primarily used for agenda items, minutes before published and the like, so Karl has a point. I suppose what we could do is to keep topics on the www-qa-wg list as close to logistics as possible, and have all general discussion on the www-qa list (remembering that this entails an audience that may not be entirely suited for all such topics. What about using a third list and keep www-qa entirely public and www-qa-wg "closed"? Something like www-qa-ig which would be along the lines that Karl suggests? /Dimitris On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 12:22 AM, Lofton Henderson wrote: > > At 01:24 PM 8/7/02 -0700, you wrote: > >> Why not keep www-qa-wg on the to line as well as www-qa? > > This has the side effect that all QAWG members get two copies. I guess > that's better than the broken threads. > > -Lofton. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 1:06 PM >> To: Karl Dubost; www-qa-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Organisational Reminder >> >> >> There is a problem about switching a thread from one list to another, >> that >> I dislike a lot. If something starts on www-qa-wg, and it is switched >> to >> www-qa, then the thread is broken on the original archive. It simply >> stops, as if the thread died. >> >> Even if you know that it continues on the other archive, you can't use >> the >> "next in thread" button. It is pretty inconvenient. >> >> Comments or suggestions? >> >> -Lofton. >> >> At 09:18 AM 8/7/2002 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >I would like to remind few principles. >> > >> >- Every issues raised on www-qa-wg MUST be discussed on www-qa >> >- Do not hit Reply and Send. >> >- How to do: >> > 1. Reply on www-qa@w3.org >> > 2. Gives the references to the message >> > by using msg-id (not recommended, only if you are offline and >> > can't do another way.) >> > >> >http://www.w3.org/2002/02/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20020805150918.03f30c60@rockyn >> et.com >> > or web archive reference (preferred) >> > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Aug/0027.html >> > 3. start your discussion. >> >- If the topic is slighty different from the subject, modify it. >> > >> >Thank you. >> > >> >-- >> >Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager >> > http://www.w3.org/QA/ >> > >> > --- Be Strict To Be Cool! --- >> > >
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 02:59:27 UTC