- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:41:01 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QA Working Group -- At [1] you will find an Editors-only draft of OpsExtech. There is still a lot of cleanup, verification, linking, and other work to be done on it, but it is substantially in the shape that we propose for FPWD. What is interesting about it is that it is now bi-directionally linked with Ops Guidelines [2] at the per-checkpoint level. (Note. [2] is an old draft -- just adapted for illustration purposes.) At the last teleconference, we essentially agreed to go to FPWD with a document of this scope. So please have a look. The scope (now and future) is discussed in the Introduction [3]. I'd also like any opinions about the proposed but barely-started section of assessment/lessons [4]. Is it okay to do FPWD without such? Comments welcome. -Lofton [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/04/qaframe-ops-extech-0429.html [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/04/qaframe-ops-0429.html [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/04/qaframe-ops-extech-0429.html#b2ab3b7 [4] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/04/qaframe-ops-extech-0429.html#b2ab3d463
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 18:40:40 UTC