- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 10:18:45 PDT
- To: www-proxy@w3.org
The HTTP working group is having the most trouble with issues around caching of negotiated content. Some of our difficulties have come from different interpretations for terms ("entity", "resource") and arguments about which of several choices of new termonology we should make, but there are also some protocol design choices that go beyond terminology. It's imperitive that we finish HTTP/1.1 in the next two weeks. If you've put off mailing in your review of the May 2 draft draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt or draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.ps please do so now. If you don't get around to sending in your comments by Monday, then there'll be a new draft available toward the end of this week that will need a careful reading, as we'll want to go to 'proposed standard' soon after. My interpretation of "rough consensus and running code" is "most everybody agrees but that arguments based on interoperable implementations have more weight". Because of this, I'd rather hear comments from those who have running implementations sooner rather than later. Send reviews of the internet-draft to http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com, not just to me. Larry
Received on Saturday, 18 May 1996 13:19:03 UTC