RE: [arch] mc specific test assertions for cancel

Hey Debbie,

Yes, this solution is acceptable.

Dirk

Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com> schrieb:

>Hi Dirk,
>We haven't received any other comments that would require republishing the IR Plan. We plan to republish in a few days with Assertion 24 removed. 
>Please let us know if this resolution is acceptable.
>Best regards,
>Debbie Dahl
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka [mailto:dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org]
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 4:03 AM
>> To: Deborah Dahl
>> Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: [arch] mc specific test assertions for cancel
>> 
>> Hey Debbie,
>> 
>> are there further changes of this plan due to experiences that others
>> mad? When will it be published?
>> 
>> Dirk
>> 
>> > Hi Dirk,
>> > We've discussed your question in the Working Group, and we agree with
>> your
>> > suggestion that test assertions 178 (a modality component MUST return a
>> > CancelResponse event in response to a CancelRequest) and assertion 24
>> > (CancelResponse MUST be sent by the modality component as a response
>> to the
>> > CancelRequest) are basically duplicates. We plan to remove assertion 24
>> and
>> > republish the Implementation Report Plan.
>> > Since we are tracking all comment threads at this point, please let us know
>> > by June 15 if this resolution is acceptable, otherwise we will assume that
>> > you agree with our decision (but it is very helpful to have an explicit
>> > response).
>> > Best regards,
>> > Debbie Dahl, MMI WG Chair
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>
>