- From: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:23:34 -0400
- To: "'Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka'" <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
- Cc: <www-multimodal@w3.org>
Hi Dirk, We haven't received any other comments that would require republishing the IR Plan. We plan to republish in a few days with Assertion 24 removed. Please let us know if this resolution is acceptable. Best regards, Debbie Dahl > -----Original Message----- > From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka [mailto:dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 4:03 AM > To: Deborah Dahl > Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org > Subject: Re: [arch] mc specific test assertions for cancel > > Hey Debbie, > > are there further changes of this plan due to experiences that others > mad? When will it be published? > > Dirk > > > Hi Dirk, > > We've discussed your question in the Working Group, and we agree with > your > > suggestion that test assertions 178 (a modality component MUST return a > > CancelResponse event in response to a CancelRequest) and assertion 24 > > (CancelResponse MUST be sent by the modality component as a response > to the > > CancelRequest) are basically duplicates. We plan to remove assertion 24 > and > > republish the Implementation Report Plan. > > Since we are tracking all comment threads at this point, please let us know > > by June 15 if this resolution is acceptable, otherwise we will assume that > > you agree with our decision (but it is very helpful to have an explicit > > response). > > Best regards, > > Debbie Dahl, MMI WG Chair > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:24:26 UTC