- From: Miller, Bruce R. (Fed) <bruce.miller@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:44:39 -0500
- To: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>, Stephen Watt <smwatt@gmail.com>
- Cc: Murray Sargent <murrays@exchange.microsoft.com>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
On 11/10/22 5:09 PM, Neil Soiffer wrote: > Stephen, > > If there are no defaults, then all instances of msup require an intent. So not only do the "Require" only if you require that msup is *never* spoken as "superscript". Having a defaulting mechanism, and a set (or sets) of defaulting rules is a good thing! But it should be optional, and they should only be applied if there is an assertion that those rules apply to a particular document (or formula or ...). Otherwise, all the existing, and most future, MathML will suddenly be *required* to be read incorrectly. (as opposed to "is currently read incorrectly by overzealous AT") bruce -- bruce.miller@nist.gov http://math.nist.gov/~BMiller/
Received on Friday, 11 November 2022 13:44:57 UTC