Re: First MathML-Core meeting Monday June 28

On 26/06/2021 01:22, Brian Kardell wrote:
> I believe everyone should have received an invite for the first 
> MathML-Core meeting on Monday with information necessary to join.. 
> I've sketched out a brief agenda to get us started.  Just like the 
> intent meeting, we'll use cryptpad, but a different one..
>
> https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/GjEg5+su0MrBXGVh+B0bXiJx/ 
> <https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/GjEg5+su0MrBXGVh+B0bXiJx/>
>
> See you then!
>
>
I'm travelling tomorrow and it's possible that I can't get to the 
meeting so an update on the status of the mathml-core spec

The respec generated draft has some pubrules warnings. That's fixable 
but probably not by tomorrow (mostly issues around our practice 
inherited from the mathml-refresh repositories of using mathml/issues 
for all the related specs even though they have separate repositories).

To see how far we are I simply edited the generated document by hand: it 
only took a couple of changes to clear pubrules, clearing the link 
checker took rather more as many fragids to external specs were broken 
due to re-arrangements in other specs, so I fixed those.


I'll move those fixes back to the git source but I did them on a "live" 
copy to get quicker feedback from the link checker so there is a copy at 
a (temporary) location

https://texlive.net/mathml-core/Overview.html


With pubrules and link checker links:

https://www.w3.org/pubrules/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftexlive.net%2Fmathml-core%2FOverview.html&profile=FPWD&validation=simple-validation&noRecTrack=false&informativeOnly=false&echidnaReady=false&patentPolicy=pp2020

https://validator.w3.org/checklink?uri=https%3A%2F%2Ftexlive.net%2Fmathml-core%2FOverview.html&hide_type=all&recursive=on&depth=2&check=Check


That copy was built from the opdict branch so assuming  PR35 to merge 
that branch

https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/pull/35


I'd strongly urge that we merge that PR and build from the current 
operator dictionary as there are several improvements (and maintaining 
this spec if we can't build from the current sources will be difficult)


Either way we decide on PR35 I think we are in a position to build a 
draft that passes pubrules and link checker and we can request be posted 
as a first public working draft of mathml-core.

Hope to see people on the call tomorrow


David

Disclaimer

The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
30 St. Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LE, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.