You are indeed right and I'm wrong. For whatever reason, the \big (and
\bigg) versions of those characters produce very different looking
characters than the non-stretched ones in LaTeX.
So I agree with David's original suggestion for the values.
Neil Soiffer
Senior Scientist
Design Science, Inc.
www.dessci.com
~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, Equation Editor ~
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:24:35PM -0700, Neil Soiffer wrote:
> > I believe that the entry in http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names is
> wrong.
> >
> > I wrote an example in LaTeX and 23B0 & 23B1 are *not* the glpyhs that
> LaTeX
> > produces.
>
> CM fonts seem to not have normal size glyphs for those two, try
> \big\lmoustache and \big\rmoustache. The TeXbook only shows the big
> glyphs.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
>