- From: Hermitech Laboratory <info@mmlsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:27:06 +0200 (EET)
- To: "Paul Libbrecht" <paul@activemath.org>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Dear Paul, thank you for your question. If answering in brief, the majority of w3org test cases are supported. Silverlight client requests our desktop editor (Formulator MathML Weaver), that is installed on a server. Desktop version is being developed for last 7 years and has quite good support both for MathML entities and test cases coverage. So online version has the same MathML conformance results, as our desktop editor. You can download results of conformance with MathML 2.0 standard in http://www.mmlsoft.com/dmdocuments/FormulatorMathML2.0Conformance.pdf document and W3C test suite coverage in http://www.mmlsoft.com/dmdocuments/FormulatorMathML2.0TestSuite.pdf document. >From the time when these documents were created for a former version of the desktop editor, our results become only better. I didn't understand quite well the second question, sorry. If you mean human languages, surely we support Unicode and typing in different languages. If you mean languages other tham MathML, not yet, but we would like to. Finally, if talking about choice of Silverlight, I willingly agree that in some sense it's not so good, since, for instance, Flash plugin is much more widespread. On the contrary, from our point of view (as software developers) Silverlight means faster and easier start. It's important. Our editors are free, and our work doesn't bring profit for us, so we would not really like to do spend useless efforts before we know that such a project can be useful for someone. That's why exactly Silverlight client comes first. On the other hand, it's absolutely not important for us which browser plugin is used for the client part of online MathML editor. Now it is Silverlight, and tomorrow it can be Flash or whatever. The major part of our interest up to now was to build a case of completed and fully functional distributed online MathML editor that can be easily widen in a sense of clients implementation and to understand if there will be any interest to this project. The choice of browser plugin technology (as opposed to a scripting language approach) is more essential point than a choice of Silverlight, Flash or some other plugin. Best regards, Vyacheslav
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 06:27:57 UTC