- From: Patrick ION <ion@ams.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:38:24 -0400
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>, www-math@w3.org
On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:23 PM, David Carlisle wrote: > On 15/07/2010 22:33, Patrick Ion wrote: >> >> I have updated and committed the Last Call Dispositions documents, >> which can be accessed through >> http://www.w3.org/Math/lastcall3/Overview.html >> > > I'm pretty confused by the document I think, > > http://www.w3.org/Math/Documents/lc-changes.html > > which versions of the document is detailing differences between? > Oh, dear! The lc-changes.html is supposed to document the changes from the CR document to that which we offer for PR. These result from the two LC periods. I think the preamble says that. In any case I think there are 8 new entries added which have [LC2] labels. > The first column points to the undated version of the diff marked spec in Tr space eg > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter3-d.html#presm.intro > > which is the diff between LC2 and the earlier CR > > I was going to suggest all links should use the dated form > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-MathML3-20100610/chapter3-d.html#presm.intro > > to clarify that but > then realised you also have newer diffs eg the lax schema one in 6.4 which also links to > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter6-d.html#world-int-combine-other > > but that doesn't show the diff. That last is something I didn't catch and presumably have to adjust. I think we need as the diff that between final PR and CR. That's what a Team Meeting might worry about. > > > Shouldn't this be two documents one detailing the diff between LC2 and CR and one detailing the diff between the proposed PR and LC2 9which could link to draft-spec eithet in Group/member or my public copy at monet.nag. > > or it could be one document as now but pointing to different diff marked versions, but that's probably harder to maintain or understand. > I noted above what I think the intent was. Of course, with only 8 new entries it isn't hard to break things out into an lc-changes (exactly as was) and lc2-changes with diff between PR and LC2. I thought the point was PR relative to CR. Patrick
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 09:39:00 UTC