- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:46:26 +0100
- To: Patrick ION <ion@ams.org>
- Cc: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>, www-math@w3.org
On 16/07/2010 10:38, Patrick ION wrote: >> but that doesn't show the diff. > That last is something I didn't catch and presumably have to adjust. I think > we need as the diff that between final PR and CR. That's what a Team Meeting > might worry about. I did ask after we started the LC version whether we should keep the diff marking (so the current diff marking would be the accumulated diffs) or whether we shoudl zero-out the diff marking before starting teh edits. All replies said that the diff marked version for the PR draft should be the diffs against the LC2 draft so that's what I did. >> Given where we are I'd keep the combined document but arrange things so the links for diffs between LC2 and CR point to the dated CR diff spec and the links between (draft)PR and LC2 point to the public editors draft at monet.nag. and probably say something to that effect in the document preamble David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 09:46:54 UTC