- From: Robert Miner <robertm@dessci.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:31:32 -0800
- To: "Paul Libbrecht" <paul@activemath.org>, <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D1EFB337111B674B8F1BE155B01C6DD6034CCA61@franklin.corp.dessci>
Hi. This message records the resolution of the last call comment quoted below. The changes were: - fixing incorrect casing of the encoding attribute values MathML, MathML-Presentation and MathML-Content in chapters 3, 5 and 6. - changing the encoding to application/vnd.wolfram.mathematica for the Mathematica example. - changing the encoding to application/x-tex for the examples of TeX annotations --Robert CVS logs: presentation-markup.xml revision 1.307 date: 2009/11/22 19:05:12; author: rminer; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 corrected casing of encoding values mixing.xml revision 1.127 date: 2009/11/03 22:22:17; author: rminer; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 world-interactions.xml revision 1.67 date: 2009/11/22 19:05:13; author: rminer; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 corrected casing of encoding values Dr. Robert Miner Vice President, Research and Development Design Science, Inc. 140 Pine Avenue, 4th Floor Long Beach, California 90802 USA Main: (562) 432-2920 Direct: (651) 223-2883 Fax: (651) 292-0014 robertm@dessci.com www.dessci.com ________________________________ From: www-math-request@w3.org on behalf of Paul Libbrecht Sent: Wed 10/7/2009 8:03 AM To: Public MathML mailing list Subject: [MathML3-last-call] media-types mentioned in encoding attributes Hello all, MathML3 now define three media-types in the appendix B, this is the objective of another mail I will send to ietf-types. My objective is to discuss the encoding attribute values within examples. Since MathML3, the annotation and annotation-xml elements carry the encoding attribute with the following recommended content: 1.- MathML-Presentation 2.- MathML-Content 3.- MathML 4.- the media-type of the annotation 5.- some text value you expect someone will recognize If you look at the specification we have the following example values; I note that there are spurious occurrences of versions of 1, 2, and 3 with a different casing which we should clean. Aside of 1, 2, and 3 there are: - well known media-types: image/png, text/plain, application/xhtml +xml, image/tiff, image/svg+xml. No issues here. - not yet standardized media-types: -- application/openmath+xml: should probably be done by the OpenMath society one day, this follows directly RFC-3023 so there's no big debate here -- application/x-maple: is justified by some documentation pages on MapleSoft's documentation and a private email exchange with Andrew Smith of MapleSoft. This is done for the sake of an "unregistered media type". -- application/mathematica has been requested to change by Jason Harris of Wolfram Research to application/vnd.wolfram.mathematica in the mail I reproduce below. I hereby propose to perform this change. - non-standardized string: TeX, For this type, I have to say, there is no standard and it seems impossible to safely define one. We could replace it by application/x-tex which is what the Apache server delivers for a .tex file. On this point, I request suggestions. thank you in advance for your comments. paul > De : Jason Harris <...> > Date : 1 octobre 2009 19:17:04 GMT+02:00 > À : paul@activemath.org > Objet : Rép : MathML3 followup [TS 37366] > > [...] > ---------------- > > For the MathML 3 sepc, can someone update the draft in the > appropriate places to reflect the following change: Mathematica's > MIME type will change in the next version. > > In detail: > We're registering new MIME types for future versions of > Mathematica. The one which would replace application/mathematica > is... > > application/vnd.wolfram.mathematica > > Assuming this is accepted by IANA (We have already received initial > comments with only minor requests for updates, so I have no reason > to expect a rejection), this is what we'll use in future versions of > Mathematica. application/mathematica will become a legacy type. > > One of the differences in application/vnd.wolfram.mathematica is > that the version specification is now *optional*, not required. > > Sincerely, > > Jason Harris > Wolfram Research > [....]
Received on Sunday, 22 November 2009 20:32:05 UTC