Re: MathML-in-HTML5

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote:
> > 
> > IMHO backwards compatibility is not just "desirable", it is absolutely 
> > and fundamentally critical. Specification authors should always make 
> > their specs backward and forward looking.
> 
> Then why all this stuff? Since you are proposing (ups i forgot that you 
> are not proposing anything even if look that) is not backward compatible 
> with current status of MathML authoring and processing.

The idea of introducing math markup to text/html documents is completely 
orthogonal from the existence of MathML markup in XML documents. 
Compatibility with current MathML authoring and processing is neither here 
nor there -- the proposal here doesn't affect it in any way.


> You can do [various things that have been at one time or another 
> suggested] but do not call it ***mathml***

Ok.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:03:47 UTC