- From: Paul Topping <pault@dessci.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:07:01 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Roger B. Sidje" <rbs@maths.uq.edu.au>
- Cc: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, <www-math@w3.org>, <dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org>
Ian, I sense some sort of conflicting themes here or perhaps I'm just confused. Your earlier comments made me think that HTML 5 might be about stronger validation as you were worried about what MathPlayer might do with bad markup and suggested that refusing to render the document might be the right response. I see this as inconsistent with the position of <math> tags not indicating what XML namespace they represent and comments like, "... all they really want is to throw maths into their document." So, this made me wonder what HTML 5 really was supposed to be. The name would imply that it is HTML's tag soup extended with some new stuff like MathML and, perhaps, with some of the worst soup removed if it was deemed unnecessary to compatibility with all the HTML out in the world and the tools that make it. I would also assume that since your WHATWG document (http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/) seems to distinguish between XHTML5 and HTML5 that they are versions of XHTML and HTML enhanced in parallel ways. Am I wrong? Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] > Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:42 PM > To: Roger B. Sidje > Cc: Paul Topping; David Carlisle; www-math@w3.org; > dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org > Subject: Re: MathML-in-HTML5 > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Roger B. Sidje wrote: > > > > Even if the exceptional circumstance is made more specific? > There is > > probably zero page with the specific attribute-value pair <math > > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> > > If we only allow that particular case, then why not simplify > it further: > > <math> > > > > I would guess that MathML authors/generators would be > comfortable with > > that. More importantly, the sure guarantee would be the > absence of any > > rendering on the screen... (With that, they can't forget.) > > It's not a matter of forgetting, it's a matter of wasted time > trying to > understand an obscure concept when all they really want is to > throw maths > into their document. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E > )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ > _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. > `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:07:23 UTC