- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:24:02 +0100
- To: beshenov@bk.ru
- CC: darrell@webctr.com, www-math@w3.org, hwg-xml@hwg.org
> This message is also addressed to David Carlisle There is no need to include me separately in the To: field, I get www-math mail. I'm not sure what the question is, as I don't think the earlier messages were posted to www-math? But in answer to: DK> So, W3-validator can't process my "xmlns:m"?.. And is this code valid: If you use a prefix for either the XHTML or MathML namespace then it is not, by default, valid to the published XHTML+MathML DTD. DTD's do not automatically adapt to prefixes in ways allowed by the XML Namespace Recommendation, although so long as you restrict to using a single prefix in each document, it is possible to make DTD valid instances, but you need to define extra parameter entities in the internal subset of the dtd. Examples are given in Appendix A of the MathML spec. http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/appendixa.html#parsing.dtd.param Of course if you already know your source document is valid and are generating html+mathml (with an html mime type) for mathplayer and techexplorer, then you don't really need to put a <!DOCTYPE on the document at all. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 15:27:17 UTC