- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:31:40 +0100
- To: beshenov@bk.ru
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> If User-agent not MSIE, than send as "application/xml". For mozilla and friends it's probably better to use application/xhtml+xml as that will turn on XHTML (and MathML) rendering automatically. > I don't know, have W3C HTML-validator special "User-Agent", but, > anyway, if it is possible to detect Validator by some parameters, > site engine can add doctype and remove namespaces especially for > Validator, to make checking documents possible... Possibly, but really for checking whole sites I wouldn't use the online validator. The online service is basically a wrapper around the sp SGML parser which is freely available and can be used locally to check your site content. If the content is all XHTML, and so all XML rather than HTML (SGML) then it's even easier, as you don't need the complication of an SGML parser, and validating XML parser will do the job. Personally I use rxp for this, it's free, fairly fast and very conformant to the XML specification, rxp -sxV myfile.xml reports any dtd validation errors which you can then do before you even put content on your site. Other than that, your plan seems reasonable. Note I added www-math back to the CC list, this is a general discussion list and I'm sure other people on this list will be interested to know how you get on, so feel free to post again to the list, with any pointers to your mathml pages, or further queries! David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2005 09:32:08 UTC