- From: Frank Yung-Fong Tang <franktang@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:34:44 -0500
- To: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org
I guess similar arguement make the RDF WG to create SPARQL Query Language for RDF http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/ instead of extending XQuery to add facility for RDF.... Maybe MathML WG should create a MathMLQL to query MathML instead .... On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:51:26 -0800, Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com> wrote: > The following is a personal response: > > Note that the XQueryX syntax is supposed to represent XQuery both on the syntactic and semantic level. I am not sure that we should or can another markup language and reinterpret it in a different context. > > Best regards > Michael > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frank Yung-Fong Tang > > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:41 PM > > To: www-math@w3.org; public-qt-comments@w3.org > > Subject: [XQueryX] reuse MathML Content Markup to represent XQuery in > > XQueryX > > > > > > 1. Have anyone consider or try to spec out a XQueryX proposal that use > > the MathML Content Markup as spec out in > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html to express XQuery into XML > > syntax ? It looks like the MathML content markup should be powerful to > > express most of the XQuery syntax, even the XPath part. > > > > It will be very nice if W3 XQuery Working Group can base the existing > > MathML W3C recommendation to develop the XQueryX sytax instead of > > create yet one another sytax to encode query expression that most of > > them can be done by existing standard. > > > > 2. Any one have experience of using XQuery with MathML content markup? > > > > -- > > Frank Yung-Fong Tang > > 譚永鋒 > > Šýšţém Årçĥîţéçţ > > -- Frank Yung-Fong Tang 譚永鋒 Šýšţém Årçĥîţéçţ
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 22:35:15 UTC