- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:51:26 -0800
- To: "Frank Yung-Fong Tang" <franktang@gmail.com>, <www-math@w3.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
The following is a personal response: Note that the XQueryX syntax is supposed to represent XQuery both on the syntactic and semantic level. I am not sure that we should or can another markup language and reinterpret it in a different context. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frank Yung-Fong Tang > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:41 PM > To: www-math@w3.org; public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [XQueryX] reuse MathML Content Markup to represent XQuery in > XQueryX > > > 1. Have anyone consider or try to spec out a XQueryX proposal that use > the MathML Content Markup as spec out in > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html to express XQuery into XML > syntax ? It looks like the MathML content markup should be powerful to > express most of the XQuery syntax, even the XPath part. > > It will be very nice if W3 XQuery Working Group can base the existing > MathML W3C recommendation to develop the XQueryX sytax instead of > create yet one another sytax to encode query expression that most of > them can be done by existing standard. > > 2. Any one have experience of using XQuery with MathML content markup? > > -- > Frank Yung-Fong Tang > 譚永鋒 > Šýšţém Årçĥîţéçţ
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 21:50:49 UTC