- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:20:14 +0100
- To: justin.garofoli@gmail.com
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> I am missing something, or asking too much of you. I guess the > simplest answer to my question would be one that answers the question > of where a dtd for xhtml1.0 (strict or transitonal) plus mathml is. the only pre-built mathml+xhtml dtd is based on xhtml 1.1 and is at http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd The differences between xhtml 1.0 and 1.1 are notgreat do you _really_ need a 1.0 DTD? If so it would be easy enough to make one, just reference a file that looks something like <!ENTITY % m SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/mathml2.dtd"> <!ENTITY % h SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <!ENTITY % misc.inline "ins | del | script| math"> %h; %m; David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 09:20:31 UTC