- From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 22:50:35 -0400
- To: mhucka@caltech.edu
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
It is definitely missing from the schema files.
The relevant attributeGroup in the file "content/tokens.xsd"
should read something like the attached.
I am sure David and/or Robert will be working out a way
to update the main schema reference.
Stan.
==============
<xs:attributeGroup name="cn.attlist">
<xs:attribute name="base">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:positiveInteger">
<xs:minInclusive value="2"/>
<xs:maxInclusive value="36"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="type">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:NMTOKEN">
<xs:enumeration value="e-notation"/>
<xs:enumeration value="integer"/>
<xs:enumeration value="rational"/>
<xs:enumeration value="real"/>
<xs:enumeration value="complex-cartesian"/>
<xs:enumeration value="complex-polar"/>
<xs:enumeration value="constant"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
<xs:attributeGroup ref="Definition.attrib"/>
<xs:attributeGroup ref="Common.attrib"/>
</xs:attributeGroup>
Michael Hucka wrote:
...
>... [ there is ]
>
>'e-notation' in Section 4.3.2.9. However, the XML Schema
>for MathML 2.0 given at http://www.w3.org/Math/XMLSchema/
>does not appear to define e-notation at all. In fact, the
>string 'e-notation' does not appear anywhere within those
>files.
>
>Is this an error in the XML Schema, or has there been a
>change to the definition of MathML 2.0?
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 22:50:39 UTC