Re: e-notation definition missing from MathML 2nd ed schemas?

>>>>> On 12 May 2004, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
  davidc> Thank you for reporting this.  e-notation should
  davidc> be added to the schema as you suggest.
  davidc> Since this isn't strictly a change to the REC
  davidc> document, I don't think that it should be listed
  davidc> in the errata for the specification but we should
  davidc> fix the schema file and document the change in the
  davidc> change log that is on the top level page
  davidc> http://www.w3.org/Math/XMLSchema/

Hi David,

Thanks for your reply.  Do you need me to do anything more
with respect to this?  And (not to be pushy, just wondering)
is there any timetable or other estimate of when the fix may
be made to the Schema?

MH

-- 
Mike Hucka, Ph.D.                         mhucka@caltech.edu  
Control and Dynamical Systems, MC 107-81  tel: +1.626.395.6911
Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA          fax: +1.702.554.3067

Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 22:40:07 UTC