- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:47:48 +0100
- To: mhucka@caltech.edu
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Mike Is this an error in the XML Schema, or has there been a change to the definition of MathML 2.0? One of those, yes. Thank you for reporting this. e-notation should be added to the schema as you suggest. Since this isn't strictly a change to the REC document, I don't think that it should be listed in the errata for the specification but we should fix the schema file and document the change in the change log that is on the top level page http://www.w3.org/Math/XMLSchema/ Thanks again, David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 05:49:26 UTC