- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Sierchio, Michael" <msierchio@RSA.COM>
- cc: "'Aaron Simmons'" <mith@samoon.srcc.lsu.edu>, www-lib@w3.org
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Sierchio, Michael wrote: > Proof that you *can* do OOP without an OOP language, but that you > shouldn't ;-) More like proof that if you want to do implement an "interesting" OO design, C gives you the flexibility to do such. :) It would not be any better in a language with OO syntax - there are too many objects, they get strung together in rather strange ways, and a hierarchy of objects is non-existent. -- Elliot Who me? I just wander from room to room.
Received on Friday, 20 August 1999 15:43:07 UTC